Thanks to a sweet little Miniature Schnauzer named Pixel Blue Eyes, who I found through Facebook, I have learned more about the campaign to put an end to the practice of tail docking. Many of you may be familiar with this procedure, but like me, did not realize how this completely unnecessary practice can lead to ongoing pain and nerve problems for many dogs.
I don’t think I ever thought about it much, when seeing a dog with a very short tail, or virtually no tail at all. Some dogs are born with short or stubby tails. But for 50-70 different breeds (most in the terrier/spaniel families), their tails are docked, most often when they are only 2-5 days old. This is a surgical procedure which basically severs what is the end of the dog’s spine, cutting through bone, cartilage, nerve endings, tendons, and muscles. It can be done by a veterinarian, but is often done by the breeder. The tail can be cut off with a surgical instrument, or even banded tightly until it just falls off. Often no anesthesia or pain relievers are used! It had been believed that new born puppies could not feel pain, but that has since been completely discredited.
Why are they even doing this? The origins of tail docking can go back to ancient times, but their reasoning back then has no place in modern times. More recently, tails were docked on working dogs to prevent injuries; such as injuries to tails from farm equipment, or injuries out in the field for hunting dogs. Even if that reasoning holds much merit, which I don’t believe it does, many, many dogs with docked tails become family pets and are not working dogs at all. For the most part, tail docking these days is mostly for cosmetic purposes. Either way, the chance of tail injury for any dog may very well be less risky than a surgery which always brings about risk of infection or complications. But that is not the only risk. Some dogs go on to be fine after this surgery. Others don’t, like Pixel, pictured above.
Complications from tail docking can include long term chronic pain and distress. It can lead to problems with potty training. Without a tail, a dog may be unable to express his anal glands (this happens naturally for most dogs when they have a bowel movement), and this painful procedure can have to be performed by a veterinarian. Dogs with this chronic nerve pain, like Pixel, often go in circles biting at their tail, trying to run away from the pain it is causing them when they merely try to wag their tail. They may have to take nerve pain for the rest of their lives. Pixel had an additional surgery back in August to help with her pain. Improvement has been seen, but she may never be completely without this pain. The video below shows the distress she has experienced when her nerve pain is acting up.
Many European countries have now banned tail docking. It can only be done by licensed veterinarians, and strictly for medical reasons (such as injury). Countries such as Australia (all the way back in 2004), Sweden, Norway, and Finland have banned it. Others, such as the U.K., have restricted it, so that only veterinarians can perform the procedure. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) also opposes cosmetic docking, but it is not illegal in this country, or in Canada (federally….some provinces such as Newfoundland/Labrador have banned it). I hope that most American veterinarians would refuse to do this, unless medically necessary. Unfortunately, we all know that greed often overrules common sense, so our country needs to take the step of banning it in the same way those other countries have.
Breeders are still performing this procedure, for cosmetic purposes only. The AKC breed standards are still calling for docked tails in many breeds. Even though these standards ultimately come from each individual breed organization, this is not helping at all. The Australian RSPCA say this an unnecessary procedure that compromises the welfare of the dog. It is of interest to note that in these countries that have made it illegal, or restricted it, that dogs are not allowed to compete in dog shows with a docked tail, unless it is as part of a working dog category, or if the docking was done before it became illegal. They even dock points if their tail is docked! That is a far cry from what our AKC is doing, which is basically nothing, to help. The AVMA believes there is “insufficient justification” for this surgery. It is only being done to satisfy an owner’s (or breeder’s) impression of what a pleasing appearance is for a certain breed. It’s not like the dog’s self esteem is boosted by cosmetic surgery as a human’s might be!
I believe dogs express themselves with their tails. There is nothing like a wagging tail greeting you when you get home. If your dog’s tail is tucked between it’s legs, you know they are nervous or upset about something. Can you see the tail blur in the photo of Cricket below? That is certainly telling you something!
Pixel’s Mom has started a campaign to try to raise awareness on this topic. She has a Facebook page dedicated to it called “No Tail Left Behind”. Pixel also has a blog where she tells about her daily life, as well as about her history with this issue, and more about the campaign to put an end to it.
What can we do to help? As with everything else, we need to spread the word. Please read about the campaign through the link above to learn more about this subject. Like and share her Facebook page to spread the word. Most importantly, don’t ever buy a puppy or dog from a breeder that docks the tails of their dogs.
Coming in Part 2:
- What should you should look for if you have a dog with a docked tail that you suspect might be bothering them? Or simply is exhibiting unexplained behavior?
- And what you can do to help them?
- What more can we all do to put an end to this outdated practice?
Must admit I didn’t read this whole essay. However I totally agree that tail docking is unnecessary and I was wrong from the very beginning.
I’ve always thought the same was true for dewclaws. Lately there has been some veterinary literature on the topic, saying that it also is not necessary.
Our last dog, a beautiful golden retriever, had her dewclaws and she enjoyed lying on her back and playing with toys. She also seem to be able to corner better on the lawn.
In the process of looking for another field trial dog, my wife and I had occasion to speak with a breeder on the telephone. We raised the topic of dewclaws because we want to have our dog with dewclaws. Since the mood has changed and vets in Ontario no longer remove dewclaws, this was not going to be a problem. However it was interesting that – when we mentioned dewclaws – the breeder jumped right into a statement of how he has seen dogs able to climb beaverdams and have better agility now that dew claws are not being removed, We didn’t need to hear this justification, but it kind of goes to show that a procedure, once established, is hard to change.
That’s so true! I was very interested to hear about the dew claws as well. Both of our beagles had them removed by their breeders, but all of our other dogs still had them. I know some people have issues with their dogs tearing them, but we have never (knock wood) experienced that. I also had heard they could help them with running.
I guess sometimes we should trust that Mother Nature – or God – whatever you believe – knew what they were doing. 🙂
Velma Ricketts says
I live in NS. Tail docking has been banned in Nova Scotia for veterinarians to perform this procedure. It does NOT stop breeders from doing it themselves at home. I have just recently heard of two local people doing their own litters at home…a litter of Rotties and two litters of Aussies. One is a backyard breeder the other is a well know show home with champion dogs….The banning in Nova Scotia has not stopped it from happening. This needs to be made illegal for anyone to do. It is simply awful
I did not realize that about Nova Scotia. That really doesn’t make a lot of sense to not let the veterinarians do it, but to allow breeders too (it seems to me it would at least be safer with a vet doing it). Is this a case of a law being in place, but no one is enforcing it? Could these breeders be turned in and charged? I really just don’t understand why this practice continues.
Velma Ricketts says
I have been contacting our local SPCA and getting the royal run around….They do not seem to feel it is a problem…..if done before a certain age. So frustrating.
Ugh, that is frustrating. You’d think at least the animal welfare groups would get behind getting things changed.
I took a litter of four, 3 day old Yorkies to my Vet’s & returned home sickened & so sorry I followed “protocol” & had the tails docked & dew claws removed. That was the day my conviction & determination to never support or put another puppy thru this unneeded procedure. I have stayed true to my vow & have adopted out 2 additional litters complete with the tail God intended them to have. I presented my decision in a very positive & matter of fact reason to potential buyers. I had no problem selling them & I know the families that adopted them only wanted the best for the puppy then & the rest of their time together. Exactly what a breeder would hope for in a potential adopter.
And exactly what a potential adopter would hope for in a breeder! Good for you! 🙂
Coralee and Finn says
This is a topic I’ve been interested in for a long time. Here in Nova Scotia cosmetic docking was banned by the Veterinary Medical in 2010, two years after I got my first Brittany who had had his tail docked before I knew what it meant. He never had any problems from it, but it still broke my heart!
Yay for Nova Scotia! That is so great they have done that. I am glad your Brittany didn’t have any problems. There is so much that we don’t know about, I think I learn something new every day….wish it was all good stuff though, and not bad things like this!
Rebecca Boren says
I still remember my shock when I realized that short tailed mini schnauzers weren’t born that way. I was appalled, even before discovering through Pixel Blue Eyes, the terrible consequences tail docking can cause. Thank you for talking about this important issue.
And thank you for caring too. I think I was more aware of ear cropping. When I was pet sitting and there was a puppy with stitches in his ears, I just couldn’t imagine why that seemed necessary. I haven’t even looked into that one further yet….but I imagine that is just cosmetic too. But I don’t know that that can have the long lasting bad effects that the tail docking does. I’ve known Rottweilers and Dobermans, and probably just thought they were born that way. I am glad Pixel has brought our attention to this!
I love Pixel and she has suffered so much. I am thankful that I have my tail and my long floppy ears and no one has ever messed with them!
And that is how it should be, isn’t it, Emma? No messing with ears, tails, or anything else that isn’t necessary!